Some days ago, almost all students have joined the strike against "rimandature," that is against the bill that reintroduces precisely the rimandature Fioroni and we were able to note the ignorance of the snobbish nerds who wondered if the next strike will be to get the candy, Furthermore, we felt the student spirit of those easy to events known only to mention the performance of the mother of the then Minister of dementia who used to do a demonstration for ordinary acts of hooliganism.
'68tini I think many of us laugh.
Certainly it was a lost opportunity to begin a series of struggles that would make the government understand that it is time to stop with this policy, ambidextrous, or conservative Left, as not only the school but also in judicial policy making is neither more nor less than what was Berlusconi. This
my last statement may seem like a simpleton denigration of government, but I think I can motivate and reiterating what I said to my friends these days, that behind this reform is the logic of the club.
¿Who gains from this reform?: Teachers who do not have to remedial courses and tests throughout the year but only a few hours after school because in the meantime the 31 of August if they wash their hands.
But not all the profs earn us completely, because this reform creates a rift still greater among high schools, more and more anchored to their immobility, and technical, professional, ex-master who will become a melting pot where it will end all that a few heads and full professors will be capable of frustrated for life or for five years. Many argue these
my guess that there will be an increase in rejected, given that Europe always stick Italy for high school dropout and, therefore, the Ministry has conceived rimandature only to end the charade of debts. Granted, the debts are a farce (but not trivial, nor one I'm living on my skin) but it is the ministry that he conceived the reform?! I want to say that Fioroni, politician who knows nothing of the school, scout, Democrat of the old course has the ability to make a reform that combines rigor and lower school dropout??
This reform is designed only to create a bit 'of consensus among teachers, who vote, and certainly not among the students, who do not vote, and in the meantime would blame their school performance only to that of T professor and ... that b ... ... the prof or the C school!
Certainly the failure rate will increase because the prof with rimandature were more likely to rage against the students, and the desire to rage between the profs there is so much. Of course there is also free time doing good, but that, debt or rimandature, has always the same means.
Now the ghost is in front of me and that in any way trying to ask me questions to adversity convinced the bill Fioroni tells me, however, if there is more rigorous university, there will be fewer people and the degree will be worth something, not like now that they get the "dogs and pigs".
And all the others who do not pass "selections"? M ... A shovel? Or simply doing casual jobs or waiting for the first criminal pardon that passes without the possibility of jumping to another step of society?
my objections to these ghost does not know what to say, shakes his head and he replies by saying that my head is full of crap and the ideological point of view of the state, with the capital "S", it is de rigueur that we need in the Italian school.
Ok! I accept the challenge and I identify with the state, with the capital "S" ... A moment that is not easy ... That's it!
First, I state, certainly do not want more criminals, and then I would like to supplement a school, or that homologous, but I am conscious that not everyone is verifiable, therefore, remains that those who are approved and who is not approved it is, which is integrated as well as possible. ¿Who is to be integrated? For those who first
social situations, family, cultural (those that Sarkozy would call scum) living the school as a useless burden: for people who have big goals is much better to offer a school culture that gives first a basic knowledge and after targeted to enter the world of work, for me to produce GDP, the state. And if this integration does not happen, needless to transform the school in a juvenile prison, it is far better to create appropriate structures for the question.
Another category to be integrated are the "indomitable," those who have interest only on certain subjects. Certainly the system of rimandature not embedding them. In this case, I state, I would see a good school system Anglo slightly Italianate. Meaning? Very simply, before a compulsory school that gives a basic culture and in recent years, albeit with some compulsory core subjects, students should be able to choose which and how many subjects do, for those fundamental, then, should nonetheless be able to choose how many hours with it, considering that in total will take approximately 30 hours. Then, in 14-15 years, there will be high school, where students freely choose to do that matters, both practical and theoretical to prepare already at work or college.
After my illustration of what I would do if the state, the ghost looks at me a bit 'and I wonder why all this segmentation in my imaginary school, I would say that to me, to produce GDP, no use a surveyor who knows the Iliad and a writer who knows algebra: I need to produce.
The ghost asks me to take my dress back from the State and myself, that's it! At that point I asked whether I'd do the same thing that Albert would I rule the school, with two-letter answer: YES! Yes heard that decided to do, as if the final hymn di Mameli, the ghost goes away, I do not know if I convinced myself or waiver of other questions. I look at that chair in front of me, empty, with no one contradicts me, and I begin to fantasize about a school that there is, but if you want to stop my dreams go ahead, there is always a free seat to become ghosts. I have mine, I said.
Alberto Spatola want to go on my blog? Click here:
http://spatolaa.blogspot.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment